One of the key limitations of the Hartree-Fock method is its treatment of electron correlation. While it accounts for exchange effects between electrons of parallel spin due to the antisymmetry of the wavefunction, it does not account for dynamic correlation between electrons of opposite spin. As a result, any solution to the Hartree-Fock equations inherently contains a systematic error.
To improve upon this approximation, post-Hartree-Fock methods such as Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP) and Configuration Interaction (CI) are employed. Both methods are based on the principle that the true molecular wavefunction can be better represented as a linear combination of multiple Slater determinants, rather than a single one as assumed in Hartree-Fock theory.
The Hartree-Fock procedure yields a set of occupied spin orbitals as well as a set of virtual (unoccupied) spin orbitals. These virtual orbitals can be used to construct additional Slater determinants by promoting electrons from occupied to unoccupied orbitals. The molecular wavefunction can then be expressed as a superposition of these determinants.
In this framework, the interaction between one-electron orbitals from different Slater determinants introduces corrections to the Hartree-Fock energy and wavefunction. These corrections systematically incorporate electron correlation effects and lead to more accurate predictions of molecular properties.
Correlation Methods — What to Trust When